Anthropometric index of Gia Rai and Ba Na ethnic students compared with Kinh ethnic in some High schools of Gia Lai province in 2022

Authors

  • Nguyễn Song Tú National Institute Nutrition, Hanoi
  • Hoàng Nguyễn Phương Linh National Institute Nutrition, Hanoi
  • Nguyễn Hữu Bắc Viện Dinh dưỡng Quốc gia, Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Hồng Trường National Institute Nutrition, Hanoi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51403/0868-2836/2024/1618

Keywords:

Anthropometric, stunting, high school, Ba Na ethnicity, Gia Rai

Abstract

A cross - sectional study was conducted on 3,291 students aged 15 - 17 of Gia Rai, Ba Na and Kinh ethnicities at some high schools in Gia Rai province in 2022 to describe the anthropometric characteristics of ethnic’s students and compare with the Kinh people. The results showed that the mean weight and height of male Gia Rai ethnic students (53.1kg and 164.3cm); Ba Na (52.2kg and 161.7cm) was statistically significantly lower than that of the Kinh male students (55.7kg and 166.7cm); The height of female students of the Gia Rai (153.8cm) and Ba Na ethnic groups (151.8cm) was significantly lower than the height of those in the Kinh ethnic group (155.3cm); However, the weight of Gia Rai and Ba Na ethnic female students were similar to that of Kinh ethnic female students. The risk of stunting in students of the Ba Na and Gia Rai ethnic groups were higher than that of the Kinh ethnic group in both genders; But the risk of wasting of the Kinh ethnic group were higher than those inthe Gia Rai and Ba Na ethnic groups in female. Therefore, recommended interventions to prevent stunting should prioritise to the Ba Na and Gia Rai ethnic groups in both sexes, but prevention of wasting should pay attention to Kinh ethnic women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

26-09-2024

How to Cite

Tú, N. S. ., Linh, H. N. P. ., Bắc, N. H. ., & Trường, N. H. . (2024). Anthropometric index of Gia Rai and Ba Na ethnic students compared with Kinh ethnic in some High schools of Gia Lai province in 2022. Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.51403/0868-2836/2024/1618

Issue

Section

Original Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>