Application of sigma method for quality and performance assessement of biochemistry testings in The biochemistry laboratory at Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City

Authors

  • Nguyễn Đức Trúc Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Phan Thị Ngọc Hân Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Ngô Thị Loan Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Vương Thị Thiên Phước Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Đỗ Hạnh Hải Hoàng Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Nguyễn Thị Kim Ngọc Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Cao Hữu Nghĩa Viện Pasteur Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51403/0868-2836/2024/2016

Keywords:

Sigma, mean, SD, CV, bias, TEa

Abstract

Sigma method is calculated in our lab and evaluated from January to June 2017 (duration 2017-2026). It is monitoring and evaluating research for biochemical assays on the AU 680 system; consist of: HDL, Triglyceride, Uric Acid, Bilirubin, Bilirubin direct, GGT and Glucose. The Sigma values are the best indicators; and the “guater than 6” is the best one on both IQC levels: normal and abnormal. ALT, AST are the best performer which has a (Sigma > 6) on level 2. Sodium, Calcium are poor performer on both level (Sigma < 3). Evaluations sigma of glucose, ALT, urea, uric acid, GGT, creatinine on the AU 680 and Cobas c501 showed that there is Sigma value agreement. However, it is a little different for glucose testing Sigma value with QC level 1 on AU 680 and Cobas c501, 6.07 and 5.37, respectively. However, Sigma value > 3 is considered as clinical acceptable. Performance assessement of biochemistry testings in the biochemistry laboratory needs to follow-up and investigate furthermore.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

05-01-2025

How to Cite

Trúc, N. Đức, Hân, P. T. N., Loan, N. T., Phước, V. T. T., Hoàng, Đỗ H. H., Ngọc, N. T. K., & Nghĩa, C. H. (2025). Application of sigma method for quality and performance assessement of biochemistry testings in The biochemistry laboratory at Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City . Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(7 Phụ bản), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.51403/0868-2836/2024/2016

Most read articles by the same author(s)